Corrigendum to "Evaluation of different air distribution systems in a commercial airliner cabin in terms of comfort and COVID-19 infection risk" Build. Environ., Volume 208, January 2022, 108590.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108590.].

Evaluation of different air distribution systems in a commercial airliner cabin in terms of comfort and COVID-19 infection risk.

The air distribution system in an airliner plays a key role in maintaining a comfortable and healthy environment in the aircraft cabin. To evaluate the performance of a novel displacement ventilation (DV) system and a traditional mixing ventilation (MV) system in an airliner cabin, this study conducted experiments and simulations in a seven-row cabin mockup. This investigation used ultrasonic anemometers and T-thermocouples to measure the air velocity, temperature and distribution of 1 µm and 5 µm particles. Simulation verifications were performed for these operating conditions, and additional scenarios with different occurrence source locations were also simulated. This study combined the Wells-Riley equation with a real case based on a COVID-19 outbreak among passengers on a long-distance bus to obtain the COVID-19 quanta value. Through an evaluation of the airflow organization, thermal comfort, and risk of COVID-19 infection, the two ventilation systems were compared. This investigation found that polydisperse particles should be used to calculate the risk of infection in airliner cabins. In addition, at the beginning of the pandemic, the infection risk with DV was lower than that with MV. In the middle and late stages of the epidemic, the infection risk with MV can be reduced when passengers wear masks, leading to an infection risk approximately equal to that of DV.

Optimization of air supply parameters for stratum ventilation based on proper orthogonal decomposition.

Under the current COVID-19 epidemic conditions, stratum ventilation can provide treated fresh air directly into the human breathing zone, improving the air quality for inhalation. However, in the design of air supply parameters for stratum ventilation, the traditional trial-and-error and experimental methods are inefficient and time consuming, and they cannot be used to identify the optimal air supply parameters from a large number of parameters. Therefore, in this paper, the inverse design method based on proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) was applied to the design of ventilation parameters for a room with stratum ventilation. Predicted mean vote (PMV), predicted percentage dissatisfied (PPD) and droplet nuclei concentration in the human breathing zone were selected as design objectives to optimize air supply parameters. The transmission of COVID-19 was controlled by reducing the concentration of droplet nuclei in the respiratory area. The results show that, compared with the trial-and-error method, the inverse design method based on POD is more than 90% faster. POD method can greatly expand the sample size. Considering the dispersion of exhaled droplet nuclei in the room, the appropriate stratum ventilation parameters can reduce the concentration of fine droplet nuclei by more than 20% compared with the traditional design parameters.

Experimental evaluation of particle exposure at different seats in a single-aisle aircraft cabin.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, exposure to particles exhaled by infected passengers in commercial aircraft cabins has been a great concern. Currently, aircraft cabins adopt mixing ventilation. However, complete mixing may not be achieved, and thus the particle concentration in the respiratory zone may vary from seat to seat in a cabin. To evaluate the particle exposure in a typical single-aisle aircraft cabin, this investigation constructed an aircraft cabin mockup for experimental tests. Particles were released from a single source or dual sources at different seats to represent particles exhaled by infected passengers. The particle concentrations in the respiratory zones at various seats were measured and compared. The particle exposure was evaluated in both a cross section and a longitudinal section. Leaving the middle seat vacant to reduce particle exposure was also addressed. In addition, the velocity fields and air temperatures were measured to provide a better understanding of particle transport. It was found that the particle exposure at the window seat is always the lowest, regardless of the particle release locations. If the passenger seated in the middle does not release particles, his/her presence enhances the particle dispersion and thereby reduces the particle exposure for adjacent passengers. In the cabin mockup, the released particles can be transported across at least four rows of seats in the longitudinal direction.